Comparing Prospect and Fort William parkruns
<< Go Back
Prospect vs Fort William elevation snapshot
Swipe sideways to see all columns.
| Metric | Prospect | Fort William |
| Total Ascent | 35.79m (117.42ft) | 91.55m (300.36ft) |
| Elevation Gain Per Km | 7.2m/km | 18.3m/km |
| Elevation Range | 10.97m (35.99ft) | 59.12m (193.96ft) |
| Flat Percentage | 9.0% | 4.2% |
| Uphill Percentage | 53.8% | 50.6% |
| Longest Climb | 560m (1,837ft) | 540m (1,772ft) |
| Steepest 100m Climb | 2.9% | 8.2% |
| Steepest 100m Descent | 4.3% | 9.7% |
This chart shows the elevation comparing both parkruns against each
other in their literal, above sea level terms.
Normalised Comparison
With this variation of the chart we normalise the chart so that the
start line is at the same level, this way you can compare the two
parkruns in an alternative way.
Bottomed out Comparison
The below charts move the lowest point to the bottom so you can compare
in another way.
Sorted Comparison
Finally the below chart sorts all of the elevation data to give you a
rough indication of the change in elevation you'll be. Typically if one
line is steeper than the other, the steeper parkrun might be more of a
challenging run.
More information on these parkruns can be found at Prospect Parkrun and Fort William Parkrun
<< Go Back
Prospect and Fort William parkrun data
On Mobile? you can scroll left and right on this table to see the data
to compare.
Swipe sideways to see all columns.
| Data Point | Prospect parkrun | | Fort William parkrun | |
| Town / City | Reading | Torlundy, Fort William |
| Country | UK | UK |
| Start Line Lat Long | 51.448432,-1.007251 | 56.850737,-5.00061 |
| Start Line What3Words | ///congratulations.acid.polite | - |
| Laps | 2 | 1 |
| Lowest Point | 53.26 meters | 174.74 feet | 64.03 meters | 210.07 feet |
| Highest Point | 64.22 meters | 210.7 feet | 123.15 meters | 404.04 feet |
| Longest Climb | 560 meters | 1837.27 feet | 540 meters | 1771.65 feet |
| Longest Climb Start Altitude | 57.06 meters | 187.2 feet | 80.34 meters | 263.58 feet |
| Longest Climb End Altitude | 64.2 meters | 210.63 feet | 105.74 meters | 346.92 feet |
| Longest Climb Gradient | 1:78
You'll go up 1 meter every 78 meters | 1:21
You'll go up 1 meter every 21 meters |
| Longest Descent | 310 meters | 1017.06 feet | 690 meters | 2263.78 feet |
| Longest Descent Start Altitude | 62.45 meters | 204.89 feet | 106.89 meters | 350.69 feet |
| Longest Descent End Altitude | 55.24 meters | 181.23 feet | 67.98 meters | 223.03 feet |
| Longest Descent Gradient | 1:43
You'll go down 1 meter every 43 meters | 1:18
You'll go down 1 meter every 18 meters |
| Flat Distance | 450 meters | 1476.38 feet | 210 meters | 688.98 feet |
| Flat Percentage | 9.0% | 4.2% |
| Uphill Percentage | 53.8% | 50.6% |
| Downhill Percentage | 37.2% | 45.2% |
| Elevation Range | 10.97m (35.99ft) | 59.12m (193.96ft) |
| Elevation Gain Per Km | 7.2m/km | 18.3m/km |
| Steepest 100m Climb | 2.9% from 20m (66ft) | 8.2% from 4,830m (15,846ft) |
| Steepest 100m Descent | 4.3% from 2,590m (8,497ft) | 9.7% from 1,440m (4,724ft) |
| Total Elevation Gain | 35.79 meters | 117.42 feet | 91.55 meters | 300.36 feet |
| Total Elevation Loss | 35.16 meters | 115.35 feet | 97.05 meters | 318.41 feet |
| Net Elevation Change | +0.63m (+2.07ft) | -5.5m (-18.04ft) |
| Elevation Analysis | Reliable | Reliable |