Comparing Burgess and Sittingbourne parkruns
Burgess vs Sittingbourne elevation snapshot
| Metric | Burgess | Sittingbourne |
|---|---|---|
| Total Ascent | 6.79m (22.28ft) | 26.79m (87.89ft) |
| Elevation Gain Per Km | 1.4m/km | 5.4m/km |
| Elevation Range | 1.94m (6.36ft) | 5.47m (17.95ft) |
| Flat Percentage | 59.4% | 18.0% |
| Uphill Percentage | 18.6% | 39.4% |
| Longest Climb | 170m (558ft) | 270m (886ft) |
| Steepest 100m Climb | 1.1% | 2.3% |
| Steepest 100m Descent | 1.1% | 3.7% |
This chart shows the elevation comparing both parkruns against each other in their literal, above sea level terms.
Normalised Comparison
With this variation of the chart we normalise the chart so that the start line is at the same level, this way you can compare the two parkruns in an alternative way.
Bottomed out Comparison
The below charts move the lowest point to the bottom so you can compare in another way.
Sorted Comparison
Finally the below chart sorts all of the elevation data to give you a rough indication of the change in elevation you'll be. Typically if one line is steeper than the other, the steeper parkrun might be more of a challenging run.
More information on these parkruns can be found at Burgess Parkrun and Sittingbourne Parkrun
Burgess and Sittingbourne parkrun data
On Mobile? you can scroll left and right on this table to see the data to compare.
| Data Point | Burgess parkrun | Sittingbourne parkrun | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Town / City | Greater London | Borough of Swale | ||
| Country | UK | UK | ||
| Start Line Lat Long | 51.481763,-0.093201 | 51.354962,0.740577 | ||
| Start Line What3Words | ///appear.type.loads | ///jokes.activism.launch | ||
| Laps | 1 | 2 | ||
| Lowest Point | 1.9 meters | 6.23 feet | 0.22 meters | 0.72 feet |
| Highest Point | 3.84 meters | 12.6 feet | 5.69 meters | 18.67 feet |
| Longest Climb | 170 meters | 557.74 feet | 270 meters | 885.83 feet |
| Longest Climb Start Altitude | 2.28 meters | 7.48 feet | 1.19 meters | 3.9 feet |
| Longest Climb End Altitude | 3.19 meters | 10.47 feet | 5.69 meters | 18.67 feet |
| Longest Climb Gradient | 1:187 You'll go up 1 meter every 187 meters | 1:60 You'll go up 1 meter every 60 meters | ||
| Longest Descent | 170 meters | 557.74 feet | 190 meters | 623.36 feet |
| Longest Descent Start Altitude | 3.06 meters | 10.04 feet | 4.65 meters | 15.26 feet |
| Longest Descent End Altitude | 2.33 meters | 7.64 feet | 3.12 meters | 10.24 feet |
| Longest Descent Gradient | 1:233 You'll go down 1 meter every 233 meters | 1:124 You'll go down 1 meter every 124 meters | ||
| Flat Distance | 2970 meters | 9744.09 feet | 900 meters | 2952.76 feet |
| Flat Percentage | 59.4% | 18.0% | ||
| Uphill Percentage | 18.6% | 39.4% | ||
| Downhill Percentage | 22.0% | 42.6% | ||
| Elevation Range | 1.94m (6.36ft) | 5.47m (17.95ft) | ||
| Elevation Gain Per Km | 1.4m/km | 5.4m/km | ||
| Steepest 100m Climb | 1.1% from 530m (1,739ft) | 2.3% from 3,120m (10,236ft) | ||
| Steepest 100m Descent | 1.1% from 4,510m (14,797ft) | 3.7% from 2,300m (7,546ft) | ||
| Total Elevation Gain | 6.79 meters | 22.28 feet | 26.79 meters | 87.89 feet |
| Total Elevation Loss | 7.25 meters | 23.79 feet | 27.79 meters | 91.17 feet |
| Net Elevation Change | -0.46m (-1.51ft) | -0.98m (-3.22ft) | ||
| Elevation Analysis | Reliable | Reliable | ||