Comparing Burgess and Valentines parkruns
Burgess vs Valentines elevation snapshot
| Metric | Burgess | Valentines |
|---|---|---|
| Total Ascent | 6.79m (22.28ft) | 20.27m (66.5ft) |
| Elevation Gain Per Km | 1.4m/km | 4.0m/km |
| Elevation Range | 1.94m (6.36ft) | 9.38m (30.77ft) |
| Flat Percentage | 59.4% | 34.4% |
| Uphill Percentage | 18.6% | 34.2% |
| Longest Climb | 170m (558ft) | 640m (2,100ft) |
| Steepest 100m Climb | 1.1% | 2.1% |
| Steepest 100m Descent | 1.1% | 2.8% |
This chart shows the elevation comparing both parkruns against each other in their literal, above sea level terms.
Normalised Comparison
With this variation of the chart we normalise the chart so that the start line is at the same level, this way you can compare the two parkruns in an alternative way.
Bottomed out Comparison
The below charts move the lowest point to the bottom so you can compare in another way.
Sorted Comparison
Finally the below chart sorts all of the elevation data to give you a rough indication of the change in elevation you'll be. Typically if one line is steeper than the other, the steeper parkrun might be more of a challenging run.
More information on these parkruns can be found at Burgess Parkrun and Valentines Parkrun
Burgess and Valentines parkrun data
On Mobile? you can scroll left and right on this table to see the data to compare.
| Data Point | Burgess parkrun | Valentines parkrun | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Town / City | Greater London | Greater London | ||
| Country | UK | UK | ||
| Start Line Lat Long | 51.481763,-0.093201 | 51.567575,0.069605 | ||
| Start Line What3Words | ///appear.type.loads | ///fight.void.steer | ||
| Laps | 1 | 2 | ||
| Lowest Point | 1.9 meters | 6.23 feet | 10.48 meters | 34.38 feet |
| Highest Point | 3.84 meters | 12.6 feet | 19.86 meters | 65.16 feet |
| Longest Climb | 170 meters | 557.74 feet | 640 meters | 2099.74 feet |
| Longest Climb Start Altitude | 2.28 meters | 7.48 feet | 12.01 meters | 39.4 feet |
| Longest Climb End Altitude | 3.19 meters | 10.47 feet | 19.83 meters | 65.06 feet |
| Longest Climb Gradient | 1:187 You'll go up 1 meter every 187 meters | 1:82 You'll go up 1 meter every 82 meters | ||
| Longest Descent | 170 meters | 557.74 feet | 330 meters | 1082.68 feet |
| Longest Descent Start Altitude | 3.06 meters | 10.04 feet | 19.86 meters | 65.16 feet |
| Longest Descent End Altitude | 2.33 meters | 7.64 feet | 14.01 meters | 45.96 feet |
| Longest Descent Gradient | 1:233 You'll go down 1 meter every 233 meters | 1:56 You'll go down 1 meter every 56 meters | ||
| Flat Distance | 2970 meters | 9744.09 feet | 1720 meters | 5643.04 feet |
| Flat Percentage | 59.4% | 34.4% | ||
| Uphill Percentage | 18.6% | 34.2% | ||
| Downhill Percentage | 22.0% | 31.4% | ||
| Elevation Range | 1.94m (6.36ft) | 9.38m (30.77ft) | ||
| Elevation Gain Per Km | 1.4m/km | 4.0m/km | ||
| Steepest 100m Climb | 1.1% from 530m (1,739ft) | 2.1% from 460m (1,509ft) | ||
| Steepest 100m Descent | 1.1% from 4,510m (14,797ft) | 2.8% from 4,230m (13,878ft) | ||
| Total Elevation Gain | 6.79 meters | 22.28 feet | 20.27 meters | 66.5 feet |
| Total Elevation Loss | 7.25 meters | 23.79 feet | 19.45 meters | 63.81 feet |
| Net Elevation Change | -0.46m (-1.51ft) | +0.82m (+2.69ft) | ||
| Elevation Analysis | Reliable | Reliable | ||