Comparing Dolgellau and Haughmond Hill parkruns
Dolgellau vs Haughmond Hill elevation snapshot
| Metric | Dolgellau | Haughmond Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Total Ascent | 7.55m (24.77ft) | 80.19m (263.09ft) |
| Elevation Gain Per Km | 1.5m/km | 16.0m/km |
| Elevation Range | 2.28m (7.48ft) | 43.81m (143.73ft) |
| Flat Percentage | 49.8% | 4.4% |
| Uphill Percentage | 24.8% | 48.4% |
| Longest Climb | 260m (853ft) | 1,020m (3,346ft) |
| Steepest 100m Climb | 0.8% | 9.9% |
| Steepest 100m Descent | 0.8% | 10.1% |
This chart shows the elevation comparing both parkruns against each other in their literal, above sea level terms.
Normalised Comparison
With this variation of the chart we normalise the chart so that the start line is at the same level, this way you can compare the two parkruns in an alternative way.
Bottomed out Comparison
The below charts move the lowest point to the bottom so you can compare in another way.
Sorted Comparison
Finally the below chart sorts all of the elevation data to give you a rough indication of the change in elevation you'll be. Typically if one line is steeper than the other, the steeper parkrun might be more of a challenging run.
More information on these parkruns can be found at Dolgellau Parkrun and Haughmond Hill Parkrun
Dolgellau and Haughmond Hill parkrun data
On Mobile? you can scroll left and right on this table to see the data to compare.
| Data Point | Dolgellau parkrun | Haughmond Hill parkrun | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Town / City | Dolgellau | Uffington | ||
| Country | UK | UK | ||
| Start Line Lat Long | 52.744632,-3.886641 | 52.72764,-2.675218 | ||
| Start Line What3Words | ///identity.banks.influence | ///honey.simple.bolt | ||
| Laps | 2 | 1 | ||
| Lowest Point | 9.29 meters | 30.48 feet | 112.72 meters | 369.82 feet |
| Highest Point | 11.58 meters | 37.99 feet | 156.52 meters | 513.52 feet |
| Longest Climb | 260 meters | 853.02 feet | 1020 meters | 3346.46 feet |
| Longest Climb Start Altitude | 10.47 meters | 34.35 feet | 121.54 meters | 398.75 feet |
| Longest Climb End Altitude | 11.52 meters | 37.8 feet | 145.88 meters | 478.61 feet |
| Longest Climb Gradient | 1:248 You'll go up 1 meter every 248 meters | 1:42 You'll go up 1 meter every 42 meters | ||
| Longest Descent | 270 meters | 885.83 feet | 810 meters | 2657.48 feet |
| Longest Descent Start Altitude | 11.53 meters | 37.83 feet | 155.42 meters | 509.91 feet |
| Longest Descent End Altitude | 10.46 meters | 34.32 feet | 112.72 meters | 369.82 feet |
| Longest Descent Gradient | 1:252 You'll go down 1 meter every 252 meters | 1:19 You'll go down 1 meter every 19 meters | ||
| Flat Distance | 2490 meters | 8169.29 feet | 220 meters | 721.78 feet |
| Flat Percentage | 49.8% | 4.4% | ||
| Uphill Percentage | 24.8% | 48.4% | ||
| Downhill Percentage | 25.4% | 47.2% | ||
| Elevation Range | 2.28m (7.48ft) | 43.81m (143.73ft) | ||
| Elevation Gain Per Km | 1.5m/km | 16.0m/km | ||
| Steepest 100m Climb | 0.8% from 4,320m (14,173ft) | 9.9% from 3,250m (10,663ft) | ||
| Steepest 100m Descent | 0.8% from 3,180m (10,433ft) | 10.1% from 2,990m (9,810ft) | ||
| Total Elevation Gain | 7.55 meters | 24.77 feet | 80.19 meters | 263.09 feet |
| Total Elevation Loss | 7.53 meters | 24.7 feet | 75.98 meters | 249.28 feet |
| Net Elevation Change | +0.02m (+0.07ft) | +4.2m (+13.78ft) | ||
| Elevation Analysis | Reliable | Reliable | ||