Comparing Ellesmere Port and Ruthin Memorial Playing Fields parkruns
Ellesmere Port vs Ruthin Memorial Playing Fields elevation snapshot
| Metric | Ellesmere Port | Ruthin Memorial Playing Fields |
|---|---|---|
| Total Ascent | 15.98m (52.43ft) | 14.86m (48.75ft) |
| Elevation Gain Per Km | 3.2m/km | 3.0m/km |
| Elevation Range | 6.05m (19.85ft) | 7.84m (25.72ft) |
| Flat Percentage | 22.0% | 23.4% |
| Uphill Percentage | 40.8% | 39.2% |
| Longest Climb | 340m (1,115ft) | 470m (1,542ft) |
| Steepest 100m Climb | 1.5% | 1.4% |
| Steepest 100m Descent | 1.7% | 1.1% |
This chart shows the elevation comparing both parkruns against each other in their literal, above sea level terms.
Normalised Comparison
With this variation of the chart we normalise the chart so that the start line is at the same level, this way you can compare the two parkruns in an alternative way.
Bottomed out Comparison
The below charts move the lowest point to the bottom so you can compare in another way.
Sorted Comparison
Finally the below chart sorts all of the elevation data to give you a rough indication of the change in elevation you'll be. Typically if one line is steeper than the other, the steeper parkrun might be more of a challenging run.
More information on these parkruns can be found at Ellesmere Port Parkrun and Ruthin Memorial Playing Fields Parkrun
Ellesmere Port and Ruthin Memorial Playing Fields parkrun data
On Mobile? you can scroll left and right on this table to see the data to compare.
| Data Point | Ellesmere Port parkrun | Ruthin Memorial Playing Fields parkrun | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Town / City | Ellesmere Port | Ruthin | ||
| Country | UK | UK | ||
| Start Line Lat Long | 53.272493,-2.902644 | 53.116001,-3.316856 | ||
| Start Line What3Words | ///deck.snows.using | ///scorpions.majority.ambushed | ||
| Laps | 2 | |||
| Lowest Point | 33.53 meters | 110.01 feet | 61 meters | 200.13 feet |
| Highest Point | 39.58 meters | 129.86 feet | 68.84 meters | 225.85 feet |
| Longest Climb | 340 meters | 1115.49 feet | 470 meters | 1541.99 feet |
| Longest Climb Start Altitude | 33.53 meters | 110.01 feet | 61.02 meters | 200.2 feet |
| Longest Climb End Altitude | 35.97 meters | 118.01 feet | 66.23 meters | 217.29 feet |
| Longest Climb Gradient | 1:139 You'll go up 1 meter every 139 meters | 1:90 You'll go up 1 meter every 90 meters | ||
| Longest Descent | 270 meters | 885.83 feet | 480 meters | 1574.8 feet |
| Longest Descent Start Altitude | 38.92 meters | 127.69 feet | 67.4 meters | 221.13 feet |
| Longest Descent End Altitude | 36.14 meters | 118.57 feet | 63.35 meters | 207.84 feet |
| Longest Descent Gradient | 1:97 You'll go down 1 meter every 97 meters | 1:119 You'll go down 1 meter every 119 meters | ||
| Flat Distance | 1100 meters | 3608.92 feet | 1170 meters | 3838.58 feet |
| Flat Percentage | 22.0% | 23.4% | ||
| Uphill Percentage | 40.8% | 39.2% | ||
| Downhill Percentage | 37.2% | 37.4% | ||
| Elevation Range | 6.05m (19.85ft) | 7.84m (25.72ft) | ||
| Elevation Gain Per Km | 3.2m/km | 3.0m/km | ||
| Steepest 100m Climb | 1.5% from 220m (722ft) | 1.4% from 60m (197ft) | ||
| Steepest 100m Descent | 1.7% from 2,560m (8,399ft) | 1.1% from 2,350m (7,710ft) | ||
| Total Elevation Gain | 15.98 meters | 52.43 feet | 14.86 meters | 48.75 feet |
| Total Elevation Loss | 15.58 meters | 51.12 feet | 12.07 meters | 39.6 feet |
| Net Elevation Change | +0.39m (+1.28ft) | +2.78m (+9.12ft) | ||
| Elevation Analysis | Reliable | Reliable | ||