Comparing Fulham Palace and Brockwell, Herne Hill parkruns
<< Go Back
Fulham Palace vs Brockwell, Herne Hill elevation snapshot
Swipe sideways to see all columns.
| Metric | Fulham Palace | Brockwell, Herne Hill |
| Total Ascent | 8.77m (28.77ft) | 86.86m (284.97ft) |
| Elevation Gain Per Km | 1.8m/km | 17.4m/km |
| Elevation Range | 9.61m (31.53ft) | 23.51m (77.13ft) |
| Flat Percentage | 34.4% | 4.2% |
| Uphill Percentage | 33.6% | 52.4% |
| Longest Climb | 270m (886ft) | 520m (1,706ft) |
| Steepest 100m Climb | 1.0% | 7.6% |
| Steepest 100m Descent | 1.7% | 6.7% |
This chart shows the elevation comparing both parkruns against each
other in their literal, above sea level terms.
Normalised Comparison
With this variation of the chart we normalise the chart so that the
start line is at the same level, this way you can compare the two
parkruns in an alternative way.
Bottomed out Comparison
The below charts move the lowest point to the bottom so you can compare
in another way.
Sorted Comparison
Finally the below chart sorts all of the elevation data to give you a
rough indication of the change in elevation you'll be. Typically if one
line is steeper than the other, the steeper parkrun might be more of a
challenging run.
More information on these parkruns can be found at Fulham Palace Parkrun and Brockwell, Herne Hill Parkrun
<< Go Back
Fulham Palace and Brockwell, Herne Hill parkrun data
On Mobile? you can scroll left and right on this table to see the data
to compare.
Swipe sideways to see all columns.
| Data Point | Fulham Palace parkrun | | Brockwell, Herne Hill parkrun | |
| Town / City | Greater London | Greater London |
| Country | UK | UK |
| Start Line Lat Long | 51.472993,-0.219021 | 51.448962,-0.10813 |
| Start Line What3Words | ///gates.assets.casino | ///dare.common.march |
| Laps | 2.75 | 2 |
| Lowest Point | -2.11 meters | -6.92 feet | 42.78 meters | 140.35 feet |
| Highest Point | 7.5 meters | 24.61 feet | 66.29 meters | 217.49 feet |
| Longest Climb | 270 meters | 885.83 feet | 520 meters | 1706.04 feet |
| Longest Climb Start Altitude | 1.96 meters | 6.43 feet | 44.68 meters | 146.59 feet |
| Longest Climb End Altitude | 3.36 meters | 11.02 feet | 63.28 meters | 207.61 feet |
| Longest Climb Gradient | 1:193
You'll go up 1 meter every 193 meters | 1:28
You'll go up 1 meter every 28 meters |
| Longest Descent | 850 meters | 2788.71 feet | 620 meters | 2034.12 feet |
| Longest Descent Start Altitude | 5.67 meters | 18.6 feet | 63.28 meters | 207.61 feet |
| Longest Descent End Altitude | -2.1 meters | -6.89 feet | 43.07 meters | 141.31 feet |
| Longest Descent Gradient | 1:109
You'll go down 1 meter every 109 meters | 1:31
You'll go down 1 meter every 31 meters |
| Flat Distance | 1720 meters | 5643.04 feet | 210 meters | 688.98 feet |
| Flat Percentage | 34.4% | 4.2% |
| Uphill Percentage | 33.6% | 52.4% |
| Downhill Percentage | 32.0% | 43.4% |
| Elevation Range | 9.61m (31.53ft) | 23.51m (77.13ft) |
| Elevation Gain Per Km | 1.8m/km | 17.4m/km |
| Steepest 100m Climb | 1.0% from 4,900m (16,076ft) | 7.6% from 60m (197ft) |
| Steepest 100m Descent | 1.7% from 3,900m (12,795ft) | 6.7% from 560m (1,837ft) |
| Total Elevation Gain | 8.77 meters | 28.77 feet | 86.86 meters | 284.97 feet |
| Total Elevation Loss | 10.94 meters | 35.89 feet | 69.98 meters | 229.59 feet |
| Net Elevation Change | -2.17m (-7.12ft) | +16.88m (+55.38ft) |
| Elevation Analysis | Reliable | Reliable |