Comparing Great Yarmouth North Beach and Worsley Woods parkruns
<< Go Back
Great Yarmouth North Beach vs Worsley Woods elevation snapshot
Swipe sideways to see all columns.
| Metric | Great Yarmouth North Beach | Worsley Woods |
| Total Ascent | 11.95m (39.21ft) | 28.6m (93.83ft) |
| Elevation Gain Per Km | 2.4m/km | 5.7m/km |
| Elevation Range | 4.61m (15.12ft) | 19.8m (64.96ft) |
| Flat Percentage | 50.4% | 12.4% |
| Uphill Percentage | 24.0% | 38.0% |
| Longest Climb | 360m (1,181ft) | 1,440m (4,724ft) |
| Steepest 100m Climb | 2.1% | 6.9% |
| Steepest 100m Descent | 2.5% | 3.4% |
This chart shows the elevation comparing both parkruns against each
other in their literal, above sea level terms.
Normalised Comparison
With this variation of the chart we normalise the chart so that the
start line is at the same level, this way you can compare the two
parkruns in an alternative way.
Bottomed out Comparison
The below charts move the lowest point to the bottom so you can compare
in another way.
Sorted Comparison
Finally the below chart sorts all of the elevation data to give you a
rough indication of the change in elevation you'll be. Typically if one
line is steeper than the other, the steeper parkrun might be more of a
challenging run.
More information on these parkruns can be found at Great Yarmouth North Beach Parkrun and Worsley Woods Parkrun
<< Go Back
Great Yarmouth North Beach and Worsley Woods parkrun data
On Mobile? you can scroll left and right on this table to see the data
to compare.
Swipe sideways to see all columns.
| Data Point | Great Yarmouth North Beach parkrun | | Worsley Woods parkrun | |
| Town / City | Great Yarmouth | Eccles |
| Country | UK | UK |
| Start Line Lat Long | 52.613219,1.740199 | 53.494018,-2.358408 |
| Start Line What3Words | ///rested.tall.cheat | ///stray.librarian.toast |
| Laps | 2 | Out and Back |
| Lowest Point | 0.02 meters | 0.07 feet | 32.2 meters | 105.64 feet |
| Highest Point | 4.63 meters | 15.19 feet | 52 meters | 170.6 feet |
| Longest Climb | 360 meters | 1181.1 feet | 1440 meters | 4724.41 feet |
| Longest Climb Start Altitude | 0.43 meters | 1.41 feet | 32.2 meters | 105.64 feet |
| Longest Climb End Altitude | 3.65 meters | 11.98 feet | 45.21 meters | 148.33 feet |
| Longest Climb Gradient | 1:112
You'll go up 1 meter every 112 meters | 1:111
You'll go up 1 meter every 111 meters |
| Longest Descent | 270 meters | 885.83 feet | 2040 meters | 6692.91 feet |
| Longest Descent Start Altitude | 2.33 meters | 7.64 feet | 51.48 meters | 168.9 feet |
| Longest Descent End Altitude | 0.75 meters | 2.46 feet | 32.22 meters | 105.71 feet |
| Longest Descent Gradient | 1:171
You'll go down 1 meter every 171 meters | 1:106
You'll go down 1 meter every 106 meters |
| Flat Distance | 2520 meters | 8267.72 feet | 620 meters | 2034.12 feet |
| Flat Percentage | 50.4% | 12.4% |
| Uphill Percentage | 24.0% | 38.0% |
| Downhill Percentage | 25.6% | 49.6% |
| Elevation Range | 4.61m (15.12ft) | 19.8m (64.96ft) |
| Elevation Gain Per Km | 2.4m/km | 5.7m/km |
| Steepest 100m Climb | 2.1% from 560m (1,837ft) | 6.9% from 2,070m (6,791ft) |
| Steepest 100m Descent | 2.5% from 90m (295ft) | 3.4% from 2,940m (9,646ft) |
| Total Elevation Gain | 11.95 meters | 39.21 feet | 28.6 meters | 93.83 feet |
| Total Elevation Loss | 10.94 meters | 35.89 feet | 28.6 meters | 93.83 feet |
| Net Elevation Change | +1.02m (+3.35ft) | 0m (0ft) |
| Elevation Analysis | Reliable | Reliable |