Comparing New Earswick and Temple Newsam parkruns
New Earswick vs Temple Newsam elevation snapshot
| Metric | New Earswick | Temple Newsam |
|---|---|---|
| Total Ascent | 17.19m (56.4ft) | 76.11m (249.7ft) |
| Elevation Gain Per Km | 3.4m/km | 15.2m/km |
| Elevation Range | 3.47m (11.38ft) | 43.21m (141.77ft) |
| Flat Percentage | 23.8% | 6.8% |
| Uphill Percentage | 35.2% | 46.4% |
| Longest Climb | 170m (558ft) | 690m (2,264ft) |
| Steepest 100m Climb | 2.8% | 7.6% |
| Steepest 100m Descent | 1.8% | 9.8% |
This chart shows the elevation comparing both parkruns against each other in their literal, above sea level terms.
Normalised Comparison
With this variation of the chart we normalise the chart so that the start line is at the same level, this way you can compare the two parkruns in an alternative way.
Bottomed out Comparison
The below charts move the lowest point to the bottom so you can compare in another way.
Sorted Comparison
Finally the below chart sorts all of the elevation data to give you a rough indication of the change in elevation you'll be. Typically if one line is steeper than the other, the steeper parkrun might be more of a challenging run.
More information on these parkruns can be found at New Earswick Parkrun and Temple Newsam Parkrun
New Earswick and Temple Newsam parkrun data
On Mobile? you can scroll left and right on this table to see the data to compare.
| Data Point | New Earswick parkrun | Temple Newsam parkrun | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Town / City | New Earswick | Leeds | ||
| Country | UK | UK | ||
| Start Line Lat Long | 53.990218,-1.077756 | 53.784599,-1.457655 | ||
| Start Line What3Words | ///heave.editor.gravy | ///ashes.blows.pillow | ||
| Laps | 3 | 2 | ||
| Lowest Point | 11.45 meters | 37.57 feet | 34.76 meters | 114.04 feet |
| Highest Point | 14.92 meters | 48.95 feet | 77.97 meters | 255.81 feet |
| Longest Climb | 170 meters | 557.74 feet | 690 meters | 2263.78 feet |
| Longest Climb Start Altitude | 12.33 meters | 40.45 feet | 41.19 meters | 135.14 feet |
| Longest Climb End Altitude | 14.88 meters | 48.82 feet | 77.91 meters | 255.61 feet |
| Longest Climb Gradient | 1:67 You'll go up 1 meter every 67 meters | 1:19 You'll go up 1 meter every 19 meters | ||
| Longest Descent | 270 meters | 885.83 feet | 760 meters | 2493.44 feet |
| Longest Descent Start Altitude | 14.2 meters | 46.59 feet | 74.25 meters | 243.6 feet |
| Longest Descent End Altitude | 11.91 meters | 39.07 feet | 34.77 meters | 114.07 feet |
| Longest Descent Gradient | 1:118 You'll go down 1 meter every 118 meters | 1:19 You'll go down 1 meter every 19 meters | ||
| Flat Distance | 1190 meters | 3904.2 feet | 340 meters | 1115.49 feet |
| Flat Percentage | 23.8% | 6.8% | ||
| Uphill Percentage | 35.2% | 46.4% | ||
| Downhill Percentage | 41.0% | 46.8% | ||
| Elevation Range | 3.47m (11.38ft) | 43.21m (141.77ft) | ||
| Elevation Gain Per Km | 3.4m/km | 15.2m/km | ||
| Steepest 100m Climb | 2.8% from 4,710m (15,453ft) | 7.6% from 2,300m (7,546ft) | ||
| Steepest 100m Descent | 1.8% from 3,960m (12,992ft) | 9.8% from 3,020m (9,908ft) | ||
| Total Elevation Gain | 17.19 meters | 56.4 feet | 76.11 meters | 249.7 feet |
| Total Elevation Loss | 17.47 meters | 57.32 feet | 88.47 meters | 290.26 feet |
| Net Elevation Change | -0.29m (-0.95ft) | -12.37m (-40.58ft) | ||
| Elevation Analysis | Reliable | Reliable | ||