Comparing Ruthin Memorial Playing Fields and Ellesmere Port parkruns
Ruthin Memorial Playing Fields vs Ellesmere Port elevation snapshot
| Metric | Ruthin Memorial Playing Fields | Ellesmere Port |
|---|---|---|
| Total Ascent | 14.86m (48.75ft) | 15.98m (52.43ft) |
| Elevation Gain Per Km | 3.0m/km | 3.2m/km |
| Elevation Range | 7.84m (25.72ft) | 6.05m (19.85ft) |
| Flat Percentage | 23.4% | 22.0% |
| Uphill Percentage | 39.2% | 40.8% |
| Longest Climb | 470m (1,542ft) | 340m (1,115ft) |
| Steepest 100m Climb | 1.4% | 1.5% |
| Steepest 100m Descent | 1.1% | 1.7% |
This chart shows the elevation comparing both parkruns against each other in their literal, above sea level terms.
Normalised Comparison
With this variation of the chart we normalise the chart so that the start line is at the same level, this way you can compare the two parkruns in an alternative way.
Bottomed out Comparison
The below charts move the lowest point to the bottom so you can compare in another way.
Sorted Comparison
Finally the below chart sorts all of the elevation data to give you a rough indication of the change in elevation you'll be. Typically if one line is steeper than the other, the steeper parkrun might be more of a challenging run.
More information on these parkruns can be found at Ruthin Memorial Playing Fields Parkrun and Ellesmere Port Parkrun
Ruthin Memorial Playing Fields and Ellesmere Port parkrun data
On Mobile? you can scroll left and right on this table to see the data to compare.
| Data Point | Ruthin Memorial Playing Fields parkrun | Ellesmere Port parkrun | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Town / City | Ruthin | Ellesmere Port | ||
| Country | UK | UK | ||
| Start Line Lat Long | 53.116001,-3.316856 | 53.272493,-2.902644 | ||
| Start Line What3Words | ///scorpions.majority.ambushed | ///deck.snows.using | ||
| Laps | 2 | |||
| Lowest Point | 61 meters | 200.13 feet | 33.53 meters | 110.01 feet |
| Highest Point | 68.84 meters | 225.85 feet | 39.58 meters | 129.86 feet |
| Longest Climb | 470 meters | 1541.99 feet | 340 meters | 1115.49 feet |
| Longest Climb Start Altitude | 61.02 meters | 200.2 feet | 33.53 meters | 110.01 feet |
| Longest Climb End Altitude | 66.23 meters | 217.29 feet | 35.97 meters | 118.01 feet |
| Longest Climb Gradient | 1:90 You'll go up 1 meter every 90 meters | 1:139 You'll go up 1 meter every 139 meters | ||
| Longest Descent | 480 meters | 1574.8 feet | 270 meters | 885.83 feet |
| Longest Descent Start Altitude | 67.4 meters | 221.13 feet | 38.92 meters | 127.69 feet |
| Longest Descent End Altitude | 63.35 meters | 207.84 feet | 36.14 meters | 118.57 feet |
| Longest Descent Gradient | 1:119 You'll go down 1 meter every 119 meters | 1:97 You'll go down 1 meter every 97 meters | ||
| Flat Distance | 1170 meters | 3838.58 feet | 1100 meters | 3608.92 feet |
| Flat Percentage | 23.4% | 22.0% | ||
| Uphill Percentage | 39.2% | 40.8% | ||
| Downhill Percentage | 37.4% | 37.2% | ||
| Elevation Range | 7.84m (25.72ft) | 6.05m (19.85ft) | ||
| Elevation Gain Per Km | 3.0m/km | 3.2m/km | ||
| Steepest 100m Climb | 1.4% from 60m (197ft) | 1.5% from 220m (722ft) | ||
| Steepest 100m Descent | 1.1% from 2,350m (7,710ft) | 1.7% from 2,560m (8,399ft) | ||
| Total Elevation Gain | 14.86 meters | 48.75 feet | 15.98 meters | 52.43 feet |
| Total Elevation Loss | 12.07 meters | 39.6 feet | 15.58 meters | 51.12 feet |
| Net Elevation Change | +2.78m (+9.12ft) | +0.39m (+1.28ft) | ||
| Elevation Analysis | Reliable | Reliable | ||