Comparing Ruthin Memorial Playing Fields and Ellesmere Port parkruns
<< Go Back
Ruthin Memorial Playing Fields vs Ellesmere Port elevation snapshot
Swipe sideways to see all columns.
| Metric | Ruthin Memorial Playing Fields | Ellesmere Port |
| Total Ascent | 14.85m (48.72ft) | 16.69m (54.76ft) |
| Elevation Gain Per Km | 3.0m/km | 3.3m/km |
| Elevation Range | 7.84m (25.72ft) | 6.05m (19.85ft) |
| Flat Percentage | 24.0% | 21.8% |
| Uphill Percentage | 38.8% | 41.4% |
| Longest Climb | 460m (1,509ft) | 330m (1,083ft) |
| Steepest 100m Climb | 1.4% | 1.5% |
| Steepest 100m Descent | 1.1% | 1.7% |
This chart shows the elevation comparing both parkruns against each
other in their literal, above sea level terms.
Normalised Comparison
With this variation of the chart we normalise the chart so that the
start line is at the same level, this way you can compare the two
parkruns in an alternative way.
Bottomed out Comparison
The below charts move the lowest point to the bottom so you can compare
in another way.
Sorted Comparison
Finally the below chart sorts all of the elevation data to give you a
rough indication of the change in elevation you'll be. Typically if one
line is steeper than the other, the steeper parkrun might be more of a
challenging run.
More information on these parkruns can be found at Ruthin Memorial Playing Fields Parkrun and Ellesmere Port Parkrun
<< Go Back
Ruthin Memorial Playing Fields and Ellesmere Port parkrun data
On Mobile? you can scroll left and right on this table to see the data
to compare.
Swipe sideways to see all columns.
| Data Point | Ruthin Memorial Playing Fields parkrun | | Ellesmere Port parkrun | |
| Town / City | Ruthin | Ellesmere Port |
| Country | UK | UK |
| Start Line Lat Long | 53.116001,-3.316856 | 53.272493,-2.902644 |
| Start Line What3Words | ///scorpions.majority.ambushed | ///deck.snows.using |
| Laps | 3 | 2 |
| Lowest Point | 61 meters | 200.13 feet | 33.53 meters | 110.01 feet |
| Highest Point | 68.84 meters | 225.85 feet | 39.58 meters | 129.86 feet |
| Longest Climb | 460 meters | 1509.19 feet | 330 meters | 1082.68 feet |
| Longest Climb Start Altitude | 61.02 meters | 200.2 feet | 33.55 meters | 110.07 feet |
| Longest Climb End Altitude | 66.21 meters | 217.22 feet | 35.98 meters | 118.04 feet |
| Longest Climb Gradient | 1:89
You'll go up 1 meter every 89 meters | 1:136
You'll go up 1 meter every 136 meters |
| Longest Descent | 480 meters | 1574.8 feet | 280 meters | 918.64 feet |
| Longest Descent Start Altitude | 67.42 meters | 221.19 feet | 35.8 meters | 117.45 feet |
| Longest Descent End Altitude | 63.37 meters | 207.91 feet | 33.54 meters | 110.04 feet |
| Longest Descent Gradient | 1:119
You'll go down 1 meter every 119 meters | 1:124
You'll go down 1 meter every 124 meters |
| Flat Distance | 1200 meters | 3937.01 feet | 1090 meters | 3576.12 feet |
| Flat Percentage | 24.0% | 21.8% |
| Uphill Percentage | 38.8% | 41.4% |
| Downhill Percentage | 37.2% | 36.8% |
| Elevation Range | 7.84m (25.72ft) | 6.05m (19.85ft) |
| Elevation Gain Per Km | 3.0m/km | 3.3m/km |
| Steepest 100m Climb | 1.4% from 60m (197ft) | 1.5% from 210m (689ft) |
| Steepest 100m Descent | 1.1% from 2,340m (7,677ft) | 1.7% from 2,510m (8,235ft) |
| Total Elevation Gain | 14.85 meters | 48.72 feet | 16.69 meters | 54.76 feet |
| Total Elevation Loss | 12.06 meters | 39.57 feet | 15.55 meters | 51.02 feet |
| Net Elevation Change | +2.66m (+8.73ft) | +1.14m (+3.74ft) |
| Elevation Analysis | Reliable | Reliable |