Comparing Temple Newsam and New Earswick parkruns
Temple Newsam vs New Earswick elevation snapshot
| Metric | Temple Newsam | New Earswick |
|---|---|---|
| Total Ascent | 76.11m (249.7ft) | 17.19m (56.4ft) |
| Elevation Gain Per Km | 15.2m/km | 3.4m/km |
| Elevation Range | 43.21m (141.77ft) | 3.47m (11.38ft) |
| Flat Percentage | 6.8% | 23.8% |
| Uphill Percentage | 46.4% | 35.2% |
| Longest Climb | 690m (2,264ft) | 170m (558ft) |
| Steepest 100m Climb | 7.6% | 2.8% |
| Steepest 100m Descent | 9.8% | 1.8% |
This chart shows the elevation comparing both parkruns against each other in their literal, above sea level terms.
Normalised Comparison
With this variation of the chart we normalise the chart so that the start line is at the same level, this way you can compare the two parkruns in an alternative way.
Bottomed out Comparison
The below charts move the lowest point to the bottom so you can compare in another way.
Sorted Comparison
Finally the below chart sorts all of the elevation data to give you a rough indication of the change in elevation you'll be. Typically if one line is steeper than the other, the steeper parkrun might be more of a challenging run.
More information on these parkruns can be found at Temple Newsam Parkrun and New Earswick Parkrun
Temple Newsam and New Earswick parkrun data
On Mobile? you can scroll left and right on this table to see the data to compare.
| Data Point | Temple Newsam parkrun | New Earswick parkrun | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Town / City | Leeds | New Earswick | ||
| Country | UK | UK | ||
| Start Line Lat Long | 53.784599,-1.457655 | 53.990218,-1.077756 | ||
| Start Line What3Words | ///ashes.blows.pillow | ///heave.editor.gravy | ||
| Laps | 2 | 3 | ||
| Lowest Point | 34.76 meters | 114.04 feet | 11.45 meters | 37.57 feet |
| Highest Point | 77.97 meters | 255.81 feet | 14.92 meters | 48.95 feet |
| Longest Climb | 690 meters | 2263.78 feet | 170 meters | 557.74 feet |
| Longest Climb Start Altitude | 41.19 meters | 135.14 feet | 12.33 meters | 40.45 feet |
| Longest Climb End Altitude | 77.91 meters | 255.61 feet | 14.88 meters | 48.82 feet |
| Longest Climb Gradient | 1:19 You'll go up 1 meter every 19 meters | 1:67 You'll go up 1 meter every 67 meters | ||
| Longest Descent | 760 meters | 2493.44 feet | 270 meters | 885.83 feet |
| Longest Descent Start Altitude | 74.25 meters | 243.6 feet | 14.2 meters | 46.59 feet |
| Longest Descent End Altitude | 34.77 meters | 114.07 feet | 11.91 meters | 39.07 feet |
| Longest Descent Gradient | 1:19 You'll go down 1 meter every 19 meters | 1:118 You'll go down 1 meter every 118 meters | ||
| Flat Distance | 340 meters | 1115.49 feet | 1190 meters | 3904.2 feet |
| Flat Percentage | 6.8% | 23.8% | ||
| Uphill Percentage | 46.4% | 35.2% | ||
| Downhill Percentage | 46.8% | 41.0% | ||
| Elevation Range | 43.21m (141.77ft) | 3.47m (11.38ft) | ||
| Elevation Gain Per Km | 15.2m/km | 3.4m/km | ||
| Steepest 100m Climb | 7.6% from 2,300m (7,546ft) | 2.8% from 4,710m (15,453ft) | ||
| Steepest 100m Descent | 9.8% from 3,020m (9,908ft) | 1.8% from 3,960m (12,992ft) | ||
| Total Elevation Gain | 76.11 meters | 249.7 feet | 17.19 meters | 56.4 feet |
| Total Elevation Loss | 88.47 meters | 290.26 feet | 17.47 meters | 57.32 feet |
| Net Elevation Change | -12.37m (-40.58ft) | -0.29m (-0.95ft) | ||
| Elevation Analysis | Reliable | Reliable | ||