Comparing Three Brooks and King George V Playing Field parkruns
<< Go Back
Three Brooks vs King George V Playing Field elevation snapshot
Swipe sideways to see all columns.
| Metric | Three Brooks | King George V Playing Field |
| Total Ascent | 15.77m (51.74ft) | 42.89m (140.72ft) |
| Elevation Gain Per Km | 3.1m/km | 8.6m/km |
| Elevation Range | 7.72m (25.33ft) | 14.39m (47.21ft) |
| Flat Percentage | 18.8% | 8.8% |
| Uphill Percentage | 38.2% | 41.0% |
| Longest Climb | 610m (2,001ft) | 160m (525ft) |
| Steepest 100m Climb | 2.1% | 5.1% |
| Steepest 100m Descent | 2.3% | 4.2% |
This chart shows the elevation comparing both parkruns against each
other in their literal, above sea level terms.
Normalised Comparison
With this variation of the chart we normalise the chart so that the
start line is at the same level, this way you can compare the two
parkruns in an alternative way.
Bottomed out Comparison
The below charts move the lowest point to the bottom so you can compare
in another way.
Sorted Comparison
Finally the below chart sorts all of the elevation data to give you a
rough indication of the change in elevation you'll be. Typically if one
line is steeper than the other, the steeper parkrun might be more of a
challenging run.
More information on these parkruns can be found at Three Brooks Parkrun and King George V Playing Field Parkrun
<< Go Back
Three Brooks and King George V Playing Field parkrun data
On Mobile? you can scroll left and right on this table to see the data
to compare.
Swipe sideways to see all columns.
| Data Point | Three Brooks parkrun | | King George V Playing Field parkrun | |
| Town / City | Bradley Stoke | Cheltenham |
| Country | UK | UK |
| Start Line Lat Long | 51.531294,-2.539105 | 51.901878,-2.110075 |
| Start Line What3Words | ///maybe.pass.allow | ///reform.loops.stared |
| Laps | 2 | 3 |
| Lowest Point | 43.81 meters | 143.73 feet | 37.34 meters | 122.51 feet |
| Highest Point | 51.53 meters | 169.06 feet | 51.73 meters | 169.72 feet |
| Longest Climb | 610 meters | 2001.31 feet | 160 meters | 524.93 feet |
| Longest Climb Start Altitude | 44.67 meters | 146.56 feet | 44.23 meters | 145.11 feet |
| Longest Climb End Altitude | 51 meters | 167.32 feet | 48.09 meters | 157.78 feet |
| Longest Climb Gradient | 1:96
You'll go up 1 meter every 96 meters | 1:41
You'll go up 1 meter every 41 meters |
| Longest Descent | 760 meters | 2493.44 feet | 490 meters | 1607.61 feet |
| Longest Descent Start Altitude | 50.38 meters | 165.29 feet | 51.64 meters | 169.42 feet |
| Longest Descent End Altitude | 44.43 meters | 145.77 feet | 41.34 meters | 135.63 feet |
| Longest Descent Gradient | 1:128
You'll go down 1 meter every 128 meters | 1:48
You'll go down 1 meter every 48 meters |
| Flat Distance | 940 meters | 3083.99 feet | 440 meters | 1443.57 feet |
| Flat Percentage | 18.8% | 8.8% |
| Uphill Percentage | 38.2% | 41.0% |
| Downhill Percentage | 43.0% | 50.2% |
| Elevation Range | 7.72m (25.33ft) | 14.39m (47.21ft) |
| Elevation Gain Per Km | 3.1m/km | 8.6m/km |
| Steepest 100m Climb | 2.1% from 500m (1,640ft) | 5.1% from 4,410m (14,469ft) |
| Steepest 100m Descent | 2.3% from 980m (3,215ft) | 4.2% from 2,040m (6,693ft) |
| Total Elevation Gain | 15.77 meters | 51.74 feet | 42.89 meters | 140.72 feet |
| Total Elevation Loss | 16.63 meters | 54.56 feet | 43.67 meters | 143.27 feet |
| Net Elevation Change | -0.86m (-2.82ft) | -0.78m (-2.56ft) |
| Elevation Analysis | Reliable | Reliable |